Meta Llama 3.2 90B Vision
Review performance benchmarks for the meta.llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct
(Meta Llama 3.2 90B Vision) model hosted on one Large Generic V2 unit of a dedicated AI cluster in OCI
Generative AI.
- See the available regions for this model.
- Learn about matching base models to their dedicated AI clusters.
- Review the metrics.
Random Length
This scenario mimics text generation use cases where the size of the prompt and response are unknown ahead of time. Because of the unknown prompt and response lengths, we've used a stochastic approach where both the prompt and response length follow a normal distribution. The prompt length follows a normal distribution with a mean of 480 tokens and a standard deviation of 240 tokens. The response length follows a normal distribution with a mean of 300 tokens and a standard deviation of 150 tokens.
Concurrency | Token-level Inference Speed (token/second) | Token-level Throughput (token/second) | Request-level Latency (second) | Request-level Throughput (Request per minute) (RPM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 48.75 | 47.98 | 6.37 | 9.40 |
2 | 47.28 | 92.89 | 6.63 | 18.00 |
4 | 45.10 | 176.53 | 6.65 | 35.80 |
8 | 42.53 | 333.45 | 7.04 | 67.80 |
16 | 38.39 | 597.84 | 7.95 | 119.70 |
32 | 29.86 | 929.18 | 10.12 | 187.40 |
64 | 30.00 | 933.09 | 20.11 | 187.20 |
128 | 30.03 | 934.30 | 39.85 | 186.00 |
256 | 30.05 | 932.61 | 76.19 | 187.79 |
Chat
This scenario covers chat and dialog use cases where the prompt and responses are short. The prompt and response length are each fixed to 100 tokens.
Concurrency | Token-level Inference Speed (token/second) | Token-level Throughput (token/second) | Request-level Latency (second) | Request-level Throughput (Request per minute) (RPM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 50.20 | 48.67 | 2.05 | 29.20 |
2 | 49.53 | 96.67 | 2.06 | 58.00 |
4 | 49.08 | 188.00 | 2.12 | 112.80 |
8 | 48.40 | 356.00 | 2.23 | 213.60 |
16 | 47.26 | 645.33 | 2.44 | 387.20 |
32 | 42.22 | 1,077.33 | 2.90 | 646.40 |
64 | 44.95 | 1,162.65 | 5.41 | 697.59 |
128 | 44.92 | 1,162.64 | 10.84 | 697.58 |
256 | 45.02 | 1,162.21 | 21.58 | 697.32 |
Generation Heavy
This scenario is for generation and model response heavy use cases. For example, a long job description generated from a short bullet list of items. For this case, the prompt length is fixed to 100 tokens and the response length is fixed to 1,000 tokens.
Concurrency | Token-level Inference Speed (token/second) | Token-level Throughput (token/second) | Request-level Latency (second) | Request-level Throughput (Request per minute) (RPM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 49.15 | 48.33 | 20.37 | 2.90 |
2 | 48.73 | 96.67 | 20.57 | 2.90 |
4 | 48.17 | 186.67 | 20.85 | 11.20 |
8 | 47.53 | 373.33 | 21.20 | 22.40 |
16 | 46.69 | 720.00 | 21.75 | 43.20 |
32 | 41.65 | 1,279.99 | 24.54 | 76.80 |
64 | 41.92 | 1,279.98 | 47.75 | 76.80 |
128 | 41.93 | 1,279.96 | 91.49 | 76.80 |
256 | 41.88 | 1,279.93 | 166.93 | 76.80 |
RAG
The retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) scenario has a very long prompt and a short response such as summarizing use cases. The prompt length is fixed to 2,000 tokens and the response length is fixed to 200 tokens.
Concurrency | Token-level Inference Speed (token/second) | Token-level Throughput (token/second) | Request-level Latency (second) | Request-level Throughput (Request per minute) (RPM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 47.83 | 44.33 | 4.47 | 13.30 |
2 | 46.14 | 82.67 | 4.79 | 24.80 |
4 | 45.18 | 145.33 | 5.46 | 43.60 |
8 | 44.67 | 234.67 | 6.74 | 70.40 |
16 | 43.43 | 336.00 | 9.34 | 100.80 |
32 | 32.74 | 394.66 | 15.61 | 118.40 |
64 | 33.25 | 416.00 | 30.12 | 124.80 |
128 | 33.28 | 405.32 | 59.98 | 121.60 |
256 | 33.27 | 394.60 | 116.63 | 118.38 |